Inside the Mind of a New York Times Book Review Editor

Today, I spoke with Sam Tanenhaus, who is an editor at the New York Times Book Review.  He’s got quite the job, receiving hundreds if not thousands of books.  As an upcoming author and friend to many other authors and people who want to get into the publishing business, I thought it would be a good idea to interview Sam.  After interviewing Sam, it’s safe to say that you need a bit of luck, and a high quality book in order to even have a chance at getting reviewed. 

What takes you from reading a book to writing a review about it? What is the process of selection?

My inclination, in almost every instance, is to think first of someone else, one of our many fine critics. On occasion, however, one of my colleagues–one of our half dozen superb “preview editors,” who do the lion’s share of reading and assigning–will suggest that I might be an adequate reviewer. This happened, for instance, in the case of a biography of Richard Hofstadter. Since I write history myself and have a particular interest in his subjects, this made sense, so I did it.

How many books have you received over the past year? How many of those books have you read? Out of that amount, how many have received reviews? Were they all positive?

We receive hundreds of books each week. I myself read only a small portion, though collectively as a staff, we read several thousand. We review perhaps 2 percent of the books published each year. Our reviews cover a broad range, from admiring to unadmiring. We have no control over what a reviewer will say about a given book. Our most important statement is the decision to send it out for review. By doing so, we’re indicating our belief that the book merits attention. The rest is up to the reviewer.

How have you built your personal brand over time? Looking back, what would you have changed as you progressed in your career?

My career, such as it is, has been one long accident. Much of what I’ve done, I would not have predicted for myself, though each step, or misstep, seemed to make sense at the time.

—–

Sam Tanenhaus was named editor, Book Review of The New York Times in March 2004. Mr. Tanenhaus had previously worked for The Times from 1997 until 1999 as the assistant editor to the Op-Ed pages. He has also written for the Book Review and the Op-Ed page, as well as Arts & Ideas, the Week in Review and The Times Magazine.

Picture of Dan Schawbel

Dan Schawbel

Dan Schawbel is the Managing Partner of Millennial Branding, a Gen Y research and consulting firm. He is the New York Times and Wall Street Journal bestselling author of Promote Yourself: The New Rules For Career Success (St. Martin’s Press) and the #1 international bestselling book, Me 2.0: 4 Steps to Building Your Future (Kaplan Publishing), which combined have been translated into 15 languages.

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

Neuroscientists studying silence found that noise degrades the brain in ways writers have always felt but never had a word for — and the mechanism is more specific than anyone expected

Neuroscientists studying silence found that noise degrades the brain in ways writers have always felt but never had a word for — and the mechanism is more specific than anyone expected

The Blog Herald

53% of Gen Z say becoming a creator is a viable career and the industry that used to mock that idea is now paying attention

53% of Gen Z say becoming a creator is a viable career and the industry that used to mock that idea is now paying attention

The Blog Herald

A 16-year study of 373 couples found whether they fought in year one made no difference to whether they divorced. What predicted it was something researchers had to watch very carefully to see.

A 16-year study of 373 couples found whether they fought in year one made no difference to whether they divorced. What predicted it was something researchers had to watch very carefully to see.

The Vessel

Edison Research finds podcasts now reach 58% of Americans monthly — which helps explain why Vox’s podcast network was worth acquiring at all

Edison Research finds podcasts now reach 58% of Americans monthly — which helps explain why Vox’s podcast network was worth acquiring at all

The Blog Herald

Yes, AI might be useful in mental health. No, that still doesn’t make it therapy

Yes, AI might be useful in mental health. No, that still doesn’t make it therapy

The Vessel

There is a kind of blog with 500 readers that has more actual influence than one with 500,000 and the difference has nothing to do with content quality

There is a kind of blog with 500 readers that has more actual influence than one with 500,000 and the difference has nothing to do with content quality

The Blog Herald