How you take rejection can determine whether or not you’ll need to do so again.
A really interesting personal branding-related story took place last week on the road to next month’s Winter Olympics in Vancouver, Canada, and as an avid hockey fan, I’m glad to have finally found a way to sneak my love of hockey into an article here for you.
In the past few weeks, national hockey team rosters were announced for next month’s Winter Olympics in Vancouver, Canada, culminating with the announcement of the USA hockey team on Jan. 1st.
Each team is allowed to choose a selection of 23 forwards, defensemen and goalies and as you can imagine, the best players per country are the ones most likely to be chosen. Even with 12 teams competing, that still means a lot of terrific players around the world aren’t going to go.
It’s not what happens to you, it’s how you respond
So let’s look at how some of those terrific players reacted when they found out they aren’t going to go.
Montreal Canadian and former NHL All-star Scott Gomez was hoping to make the USA hockey team but didn’t. Mikael Samuelsson of the Vancouver Canucks was hoping to make the Swedish hockey team but also didn’t. The similarities end there though.
Here was Gomez’s reaction in the press: “It is what it is… you get the call, you realize it, you move on and focus more on here. It wasn’t meant to be. Congratulations to the guys who made it. You just wish them the best of luck and hope the U.S.A. brings the gold.”
Here was Samuelsson’s reaction in the press: “I pretty much have one comment and maybe I’ll regret it, but they can go [expletive] themselves. That’s what I really think.”
The kicker: the teams can change their rosters up until Feb. 15th in case players get injured between now and then so theoretically, both Gomez and Samuelsson – who won gold in hockey for Sweden in 2006 – could still be invited to their respective national teams. Based on their reactions however, who do you think will have a better chance of actually getting invited if the hour of need arises?
Why would Samuelsson burn his bridges like that?
This reminds me of a recruiter’s story that I quoted in my 25-Point Layoff Success Checklist You Hope to Never Need:
“Fairly early in my career, I had to implement a RIF (Reduction In Force = layoff) for 1/3 of my department about 15 people in the terrible economy of late 2001. This was purely a monetary issue for the company, all these folks were decent performers, however, they were chosen because they were in the bottom 1/3 in terms of performance.
The one thing I learned, is that you get to see a side of a person that you would never see outside a termination : how they react to the worst work news they could possibly get. Out of the 15 people some people were angry at the company and really angry at me, some people cried, and some people handled it amazingly well – so well that in 2 or 3 cases I decided that this person was so reasonable and so mature that I would have been better off firing someone else. In fact, one person said to me, “I’m really bummed out because I love working here, but I understand. Wow, this must be incredibly hard to fire all these people, how are you holding up?”.
While I could not reverse the fact that these people were being RIF’d and I had tried to help all 15 people with new jobs and references, it was hard not to work extra hard for the people who I thought handled it well.
To this day I have a great “last impression” of them. It made me feel better about recommending them for a new job, and in one case I was actually able to hire one person back 6 months later when I got additional head count.”
With that story in mind, Samuelsson was obviously wrong to react the way he did, right? The Swedish team will never hire him now, you would think.
Gomez is only 30 years old and has a realistic shot at making the team in 2014 but Samuelsson is 33, which means he’ll be 37 next time around, an age by which many players have retired already. It looks like Samuelsson really needed it this time, but when he opened his mouth to the press, why wasn’t he thinking about being a possible replacement?
Turns out, he was.
From the article: “He also closed the door to the possibility that he could be a replacement in case of an injury. “Not a chance,” he said. “If [Swedish coach Bengt-Aake Gustafsson] doesn’t want me, he doesn’t want me.”"
Conclusion: who did a better job at brand-building?
In hiding his frustration and wishing the USA team well, Gomez’s reaction was a cliché. He certainly didn’t lose any face because of it, but for saying something so expected, he probably didn’t earn many new admirers either.
Samuelsson, on the other hand, made headlines around the world with his comment and there were probably more than a few people who not only agreed with what he said but who will also talk about it publicly. Additionally, he knows the coach well after winning gold for him in 2006, and so he likely knew that he had nothing to lose with his comment. Finally, like any professional sport, hockey is achievement-based. If former gold medal winner Samuelsson improves his already-good play over the next few weeks, there’s a good chance that all will be forgiven if the time comes to select an injury replacement who knows what it takes to win.
So it’s true that how you take rejection can determine whether or not you’ll need to do so again, but how you should take that rejection depends an awful lot on the context involved.
Author:
Jacob Share, a job search expert, is the creator of JobMob, one of the biggest blogs in the world about finding jobs. Follow him on Twitter for job search tips and humor.
Related posts:
- Tweeting About Being Fired From the New Yorker; Why Journalists Should Take Charge of Their Personal Brand All in all, last Friday was probably a good...
- My Top 4 Personal Branding Goals for 2010 I can’t believe it’s already 2010. Not only did...
- An Audacious Way to Build an Online Brand Last week, Jamie Varon (@jamievaron) made waves in the Twitter...




















I don’t know how closely you follow hockey but I don’t thnk Samuelson burned any bridges. Hockey is about emotion. Samuelson’s play this season lack of emotion is likely he didnt make the cut. The Canucks need him to step up his game, and start checking again, especially on the smaller North American rink they will be playing on this year in Vancouver.
It may not be pretty but it sends a message, if I am the GM of Sweden Sammy probably gets put a little higher on the list. Sometime’s a good personal brand is not about good customer service.
Gomez has no shot of making the U.S. squad as he doesn’t fit into the U.S. system. They are a fast puck moving crew that will be able to flat out fly…This team is much different than U.S. teams Gomez has played on in the past (you know the ones with extremely tight checking).
Great post as always Jacob. I see no problem with expressing a little disappointment but Samuelsson’s reaction was terrible. He likely burned a lot of bridges with International Hockey, maybe even future opportunities in the NHL.
Glad to see you are a hockey fan. Im from Canada, huge Habs fan. Can’t believe the US beat Canada in the Juniors Tournament. The US had the fastest team I have ever seen.
Great find Jacob. I really enjoy posts like this that step outside of our branding, marketing and business world and highlight behavior in other areas. (the area in your post being being olympic hockey qualifying)
It shows you are constantly scanning your environment for branding examples.
Thanks,
Tom
We must learn to view rejection with pride. Though its sometimes not an easy drug to use. my take about rejection is to seperate issues from my personality. It may be an issue that the other person rejected and not your personality. But let us assume it is your personality, we must try hard to prove the other person wrong by working hard more on ourselves so that we do do give opportunity to the other party to ignore us next time.
That spirit helps better than other wise
Excellent presentation and thoughts here, personal branding, emotion, and burned bridges aside this really conveys a much deeper issue. What does Samuelsson’s reaction send as a message about what we accept from potential role models? Let alone if the situation were to change down the line, based on that response should he be a replacement? I think it’s a case where regardless of his disappointment or anger at the situation he responded very emotionally. Thank you for the read.
[...] Dan Schwabel (personalbrandingblog.com) recently wrote a piece on the story of two different reactions of hockey players passed over for their respective 2010 Winter Olympics national teams. My interest in this story comes from two interests of mine: professional hockey and marketing/PR. (Yes, I know it may come as a shock to some, but I do have an interest in both.) [...]